MutaFix run: sortedcontainers-004
ranker nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B · patcher nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b · via Nebius Token Factory
- if not (value in _set): (injected bug)+ if value in _set: (original)retriever rank 1 of 20 · ranker position 1 · patched the right function yes · exact restore yes
Trace
failing tests and errors
tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_difference_update tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_isub tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_discardtests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_difference_update
E assert False E + where False = all(<generator object test_difference_update.<locals>.<genexpr> at 0x0000021F2E697E60>)tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_isub
E assert False E + where False = all(<generator object test_isub.<locals>.<genexpr> at 0x0000021F31550BA0>)
tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_difference_update in the static call graph. Kept 20 candidates, ranked by spectrum score (Ochiai), call graph and BM25 break ties.candidates in retriever order
src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.discardsrc/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.difference_updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.clearsrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.__init__src/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList._resetsrc/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__init__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.__new__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__getitem__src/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.__getitem__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__delitem__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__contains__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__reduce__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__iter__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__reversed__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__len__src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.__repr__src/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedKeyList.updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sorteddict.py::SortedDict.update
src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.discardsrc/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.difference_updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.updatesrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.clearsrc/sortedcontainers/sortedlist.py::SortedList.__init__
read src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py::SortedSet.difference_update
The failing tests involve difference_update, isub (which uses difference_update), and discard. The error messages indicate issues with generator expressions and KeyError, suggesting a problem in the difference_update implementation. Candidate 2 is the SortedSet.difference_update method, which is directly implicated in the failing tests.
The test test_discard expects a KeyError when removing a non-existent value, but the current implementation silently ignores missing values via _discard. The failing tests show that missing values cause assertion failures. The patch ensures that when discarding a value, it is actually removed from both _set and _list if present, matching set.discard behavior and preserving the expected KeyError for missing values.
--- a/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py+++ b/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py@@ -500,4 +500,7 @@ for value in values: _discard(value)+ if value in _set:+ _set.remove(value)+ _list.remove(value) return self
tests: 1 failing (target tests)
tests/test_coverage_sortedset.py::test_discard
The discard method had a logic error: it attempted to remove values only when they were NOT present, causing KeyError for missing values. The condition should be inverted to only remove when the value is present, matching the docstring and set semantics.
--- a/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py+++ b/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py@@ -393,5 +393,5 @@ """ _set = self._set- if not (value in _set):+ if value in _set: _set.remove(value) self._list.remove(value)
tests: all tests pass
model reasoning (excerpt)
We need to understand what's happening. The test_discard is expecting a KeyError? Actually looking back at the original test snippet we didn't see test_discard content. Let's examine the test file to see what test_discard does. But we can infer: The test_discard likely checks that discard raises KeyError when trying to discard a non-existent element? However, the standard set.discard does NOT raise KeyError; it does nothing. But SortedSet might be designed to mimic set? Actually the docstring of discard says: "If `value` is not a member, do nothing." So discard should not raise KeyError. Yet the test expects a KeyError? That seems odd. Maybe the test is checking that discard raises KeyError for some other reason? Or maybe the test is actually testing __delitem__? Let's look at the test file. We need to read the test file to understand. We'll do a read action on the test file (though not listed as candidate, we can still read it? The system allows read on any candidate? The instructions say we can only read candidate functions, but we can also read test? Not sure. But we can ask to read the test file if needed. However, we can also look at the error: KeyError: 1000. That suggests that when trying to discard 1000, a KeyError is raised. That means the discard method is raising KeyError when the value is not present. But the docstring says it should do nothing. So maybe the bug is that discard is incorrectly raising KeyError, and the test expects that? Wait, the test is named
Final patch
--- a/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py+++ b/src/sortedcontainers/sortedset.py@@ -393,5 +393,5 @@ """ _set = self._set- if not (value in _set):+ if value in _set: _set.remove(value) self._list.remove(value)